Mr. Hotshot
Established Member
No. Barton is better than Parker, he has a better footballing brain. Parker just sit tight and tackles where else Barton creates things
TheHotshot said:No. Barton is better than Parker, he has a better footballing brain. Parker just sit tight and tackles where else Barton creates things
Originally posted by TheHotshot:
No. Barton is better than Parker, he has a better footballing brain. Parker just sit tight and tackles where else Barton creates things
I disagree. Parker ran the midfield and looked brilliant at Charlton. What impressed me when he was there was his ability to tackle and quickly initiate the attack. And he scored a few goals for them, too. My impression of Barton until this season was headless chicken.
gunnertilldeath said:barton is good but the player i like most at man city is the mecurial claudio reyna. that guy is f*n class.
Kha0z said:I suggested Parker for ability, hunger, positional awareness and age.
Overall I think he is the best buy available in the premiership.
And I use the term available very loosely..
Ziontrain said:American or Martian, Reyna is past his best. Not that he's not useful, but I don't see that being worth more than a free. If we were going to pay money for a 30 yr old midfielder I'd only go for Okocha.
Kha0z said:Lampard is a work horse.
Individually, he isn't beating anyone.
Not Ronaldinho, Not Kaka, Not C.Ronaldo. Not Cesc.
He benefits from doing simple things well consistently.
And having world class people all around him to free him up and cover for his mistakes. Sure he has quite a few goals for a midfielder, take away the deflections however, and it's a different record entirely.
Again, Makelele, Essien and any in that role is the true spine.. that pushes Lampard.
Not to say I don't like Barton - He's honest.
But I don't see him being world class during the next five years.