We were there for Benteke, don't see a reason why we wouldn't support Buendia as wellWon't be surprised guy like Buendia who been s**t all season score his first goal with villa it always happen to us.
cant believe we actually let Benteke score 7 times against us.We were there for Benteke, don't see a reason why we wouldn't support Buendia as well
Do you go to games ?Need Buendia to score while Emi mocks our mediocrity accepting fans.
Please Ødegaard is hopeless. Leave him on the bench , we played much better when he was subbed against Brighton and Crystal PalaceI wouldn't mind 433 again but make esr lw and saka and ødegaard in the middle.
I wouldn't mind 433 again but make esr lw and saka and ødegaard in the middle.
Honestly what is the point of 433 when we are likely to defend behind the ball for most of the game?
Have we actually played a real 4-3-3 under Arteta? It has always felt more like 4-2-3-1 or maybe 4-1-1-3-1.
The Burnley and Palace games had a midfield trio of Ødegaard, Partey and Smith Rowe. That's probably the closest starting shape that resembles a 433.
Its an ineffective shape overall, if our pressing and positioning isnt good enough though.
Have we actually played a real 4-3-3 under Arteta? It has always felt more like 4-2-3-1 or maybe 4-1-1-3-1.
I was saying Nkunku all summer could have played no.8 or on the wing too.Villereal/Burnley/Palace was all 433. It didn't really look that way though as Ødegaard and ESR don't know how to play the number 8 positions. Madness we didn't sign a player in that actual position this summer.
I was saying Nkunku all summer could have played no.8 or on the wing too.